“ In April 2013, the USDA research physique, the Financial Analysis Service (ERS), revealed a examine that examined diet quality in SNAP members compared to
low-earnings nonparticipants. Self-selection by extra food-needy households into
SNAP makes it troublesome to observe positive effects on meals security from survey knowledge, however knowledge reminiscent of average revenue may be compared.
Healthy and nutritious foods, equivalent to raw produce, fish, and
grains, on common price a lot greater than much less nutritious, processed
meals choices every day. In response to Peter H. Rossi,
a sociologist whose work concerned analysis of social packages, "the program rests on the assumption that households with restricted incomes could skimp on meals purchases and live on diets which might be insufficient in quantity and quality, or, alternatively skimp on other requirements to maintain an satisfactory weight loss plan".
The research revealed a difference in food plan high quality between SNAP contributors
and low-income nonparticipants, discovering that SNAP contributors score barely decrease
on the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) than nonparticipants.
Therefore, SNAP participants are usually, on common,
less food safe than other low-income nonparticipants.
The aim of the Food Stamp Program as specified by its implementation was to help low-income households in acquiring
satisfactory and nutritious diets. ”